California is known for its huge wildfires. This season, however, has been and is expected to continue to be the worst wildfire season ever for California. I just read an article published by Fox News entitled California is Bracing for Worst Wildfire Season Ever. I want to share this crazy news with you guys.
There has been about one dozen wildfires in California this year. The damage has cost the state about $20 MILLION dollars! These fires are quickly crippling the state of California's economy. The state has set aside $600 million dollars just to fight these fires, but the California government officials are worried that it may not be sufficient. It's not just an economic issue, it's a safety issue obviously. Homes and basically families' life earnings are being destroyed. One firefighter of California stated that they're still working on repairing damage done in 2013, it's nearly impossible to catch up.
There's not really anything we can do about this. We can't effectively yell at Mother Nature even though we all wish we could. For now, we have to trust the plans of the government which isn't the easiest to do.
Sunday, May 18, 2014
Wednesday, May 7, 2014
Final Blog Assessment
The blog post that I view as my strongest is entitled Rags to Riches. I believe I sprinkle in a little bit of humor in my writing, which is what ultimately brings out my true voice. It's not the type of humor that gets you rolling on the floor, unable to control your laughter, but the type of humor that's satirical and somewhat witty. In the second paragraph of Rags to Riches is a great example of the satirical elements that I include to demonstrate voice. This line states, "They've had horrifying seasons for a slong as any golden-ager still living in the town can remember." This is satirical because I'm ridiculing how old the oldies in the town really are. I think the heart and soul of my voice/personality on the page is satire.
The diction that I include is informal for the most part, but I do include some elevated diction as well. An example of the rare elevated diction in my blog is found in the first paragraph. The sentence reads as the following: "This story is purely about baseball, so it would be absurd not to enjoy." This formal/elevated diction enhances the piece because it stresses the point I'm trying to make. It shows how serious I am that it would be nearly impossible to not enjoy the book. If I replaced "absurd" with "impossible" or something even more casual such as "crazy", then the reader would think I wasn't too serious about the point I was bringing across. I know this because I've had experience with the effects that casual vs. elevated diction has on me, as a reader. One of the syntax techniques that I incoorporated is anaphora. I used this technique in one line and it states, "They didn't just win the league. They didn't just win the city tournament." This enhances the piece because it sets up a lot of tension. The reader, while reading that line, really wants to know what they won. The anaphora gradually builds the tension. I didn't just flat out say what they won because there would be no tension build-up. With this anaphora, the tension is taken to a high level.
My blog posts have significantly matured as the trimester has gone along. The reasoning behind this is due to the great advice given by Mrs. Bross during the blogging conference (no, I didn't just say that to get brownie points), and the "knock your socks off" criteria that we were given. A big part that I learned from both of those things was to incorporate more voice, and more technology. I've been taught in the past to incorporate voice, but I haven't been taught exactly how to do this. Mrs. Bross gave me a lot of detail on this during our blogging conference, and my blogs have significantly improved and matured as a result. Also, I've began to try to include at least one piece of technology to each blog to enhance the readers' experience. I don't want to overdo it though, which Mrs. Bross also told me. In the beginning of the trimester, I wouldn't have been able to say that my blogs had a purpose. I was just writing two paragraphs because that was my assignment. Towards the end, however, I didn't have any problem with blogging. I wanted to write for a purpose. I wanted the reader to enjoy what he/she was reading, and also get some use out of writing it so their five minutes wasn't just another five minutes wasted. Overall, thanks to the "knock your socks off" criteria, and Mrs. Bross' advice during our blogging conference, my blog has slowly but surely strengthened.
The diction that I include is informal for the most part, but I do include some elevated diction as well. An example of the rare elevated diction in my blog is found in the first paragraph. The sentence reads as the following: "This story is purely about baseball, so it would be absurd not to enjoy." This formal/elevated diction enhances the piece because it stresses the point I'm trying to make. It shows how serious I am that it would be nearly impossible to not enjoy the book. If I replaced "absurd" with "impossible" or something even more casual such as "crazy", then the reader would think I wasn't too serious about the point I was bringing across. I know this because I've had experience with the effects that casual vs. elevated diction has on me, as a reader. One of the syntax techniques that I incoorporated is anaphora. I used this technique in one line and it states, "They didn't just win the league. They didn't just win the city tournament." This enhances the piece because it sets up a lot of tension. The reader, while reading that line, really wants to know what they won. The anaphora gradually builds the tension. I didn't just flat out say what they won because there would be no tension build-up. With this anaphora, the tension is taken to a high level.
My blog posts have significantly matured as the trimester has gone along. The reasoning behind this is due to the great advice given by Mrs. Bross during the blogging conference (no, I didn't just say that to get brownie points), and the "knock your socks off" criteria that we were given. A big part that I learned from both of those things was to incorporate more voice, and more technology. I've been taught in the past to incorporate voice, but I haven't been taught exactly how to do this. Mrs. Bross gave me a lot of detail on this during our blogging conference, and my blogs have significantly improved and matured as a result. Also, I've began to try to include at least one piece of technology to each blog to enhance the readers' experience. I don't want to overdo it though, which Mrs. Bross also told me. In the beginning of the trimester, I wouldn't have been able to say that my blogs had a purpose. I was just writing two paragraphs because that was my assignment. Towards the end, however, I didn't have any problem with blogging. I wanted to write for a purpose. I wanted the reader to enjoy what he/she was reading, and also get some use out of writing it so their five minutes wasn't just another five minutes wasted. Overall, thanks to the "knock your socks off" criteria, and Mrs. Bross' advice during our blogging conference, my blog has slowly but surely strengthened.
Sunday, May 4, 2014
Columnist: Sheila Moss
I recently discovered the columnist Sheila Moss. I was reading humorous columns and came across one of hers. It had a very interesting title, Interviewing Siri. After reading this column, I continued to read many of her other columns. I like a lot of things that she does with her writing: unique syntax, word choices (diction), and the topics she writes about are kind of...interesting.
Sheila Moss incorporates a lot of sarcasm and irony in her pieces. No one of her columns is even remotely similar to the other. Their formats are completely different, and I admire the fact that she can almost change as a writer for each topic she's writing about. I think it would be cool if I attempted to do this myself, even if I don't succeed, it's worth a try.
The main reason that I chose to take this time to review Sheila Moss over the other thousand columnists out there is because I believe she sets her self apart from the boring, bland, consistent columnists. By consistent I mean flat, unable to change their styles and formats of writing. I've taken a lot away from reading her columns. I have a to-do list now of things that I really want to try to include in my writing. Whatever Sheila Moss does, she does it well. I highly encourage you guys to at least skim some of her columns, it won't hurt. Below is a link to the column that I mentioned in the first paragraph. It's a very humorous, light-hearted column by, entitled Interviewing Siri.
http://www.humorcolumnist.com/siri.htm
Sheila Moss incorporates a lot of sarcasm and irony in her pieces. No one of her columns is even remotely similar to the other. Their formats are completely different, and I admire the fact that she can almost change as a writer for each topic she's writing about. I think it would be cool if I attempted to do this myself, even if I don't succeed, it's worth a try.
The main reason that I chose to take this time to review Sheila Moss over the other thousand columnists out there is because I believe she sets her self apart from the boring, bland, consistent columnists. By consistent I mean flat, unable to change their styles and formats of writing. I've taken a lot away from reading her columns. I have a to-do list now of things that I really want to try to include in my writing. Whatever Sheila Moss does, she does it well. I highly encourage you guys to at least skim some of her columns, it won't hurt. Below is a link to the column that I mentioned in the first paragraph. It's a very humorous, light-hearted column by, entitled Interviewing Siri.
http://www.humorcolumnist.com/siri.htm
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
